DP Biology (last assessment 2024)

Test builder »

Question 21N.2.SL.TZ0.e

Select a Test
Date November 2021 Marks available [Maximum mark: 1] Reference code 21N.2.SL.TZ0.e
Level SL Paper 2 Time zone TZ0
Command term State Question number e Adapted from N/A
e.
[Maximum mark: 1]
21N.2.SL.TZ0.e

The incidence of white syndrome, an infectious disease of coral, was investigated in a six-year study on Australia’s Great Barrier Reef. The map shows disease conditions on coral reefs at six study sites.

[Source: adapted from Bruno, J.F., Selig, E.R., Casey, K.S., Page, C.A., Willis, B.L., Harvell, C.D., Sweatman,
H. and Melendy, A.M., 2007. PLOS Biology, [e-journal] 5(6), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050124.]

Satellites were used to record sea surface temperatures. The temperatures each week above a reef were compared with mean temperatures for that week between 1985 and 2004. If the sea surface temperature was 1 °C or more above the mean, this was recorded as a weekly sea surface temperature anomaly (WSSTA). The number of WSSTAs was calculated for the twelve months preceding the date on which a reef was surveyed for white syndrome.

On each reef, the number of cases of white syndrome in a 1500 m2 sample area was surveyed once per year. The table shows these cases in relation to numbers of WSSTAs and coral cover on the reef. Low coral cover was 0–24 % and high coral cover was 50–75 %.

[Source: adapted from Bruno, J.F., Selig, E.R., Casey, K.S., Page, C.A., Willis, B.L., Harvell, C.D., Sweatman,
H. and Melendy, A.M., 2007. PLOS Biology, [e-journal] 5(6), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050124.]

The graphs show the relationship between the weekly sea surface temperature anomalies (WSSTA) and coral cover during two twelve-month periods (1998–99 and 2002–03), which were the warmest in the six-year study. Each dot represents one studied reef.

[Source: adapted from Bruno, J.F., Selig, E.R., Casey, K.S., Page, C.A., Willis, B.L., Harvell, C.D., Sweatman,
H. and Melendy, A.M., 2007. PLOS Biology, [e-journal] 5(6), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050124.]

This study was carried out over six years on the Australian Great Barrier Reef. State one advantage of field investigations compared with mesocosm experiments to study ecological processes.

[1]

Markscheme

real environmental conditions / larger scale investigations / more variables studied;

Examiners report

In 1e most were able to give a reason why the study was better than a mesocosm.