Recent postsView all

The excitement of discovery
9 Dec 22
Concept-based assessment
13 Nov 22
5+ is different to +5
20 Sep 22
Training students to think criti…
8 Sep 22
Intergalactic-mindedness
15 Jul 22
Some thoughts on the May 2022 IB…
30 May 22
Anti-Markovnikov addition
16 Mar 22
Initial reflections on the new p…
31 Jan 22
Covering the mandatory practical…
26 Nov 21
Greenhouse gas bulletin and COP2…
25 Oct 21
Testing concepts using the H<>
18 Oct 21
“The Strangest Man”
29 Jul 21

Alcohol in the body

Thursday 19 May 2011

Many people’s jobs (e.g. health workers and airline pilots) depend on the fact that they abstain from taking alcohol. The chemistry behind the common methods used to determine the amount of alcohol in the blood, urine and breath are covered in Option D: Medicines and drugs under Assessment statement D.4.3 . These include the reduction of the orange dichromate(VI) ion to the green chromium(III) ion used in the ‘blow in the bag’ and the use of infrared and fuel cells in different types of intoximeters. 
 

The amount of alcohol present in alcoholic drinks is usually listed clearly on the label on the can or bottle. However alcohol can be imbibed unintentionally in other ways apart from drinking alcoholic drinks. For example, certain mouth washes, gripe water for infants (see left), hand washing gels, hairsprays and cosmetics can all contain ethanol. All of these can boost the amount of alcohol in the body and lead to positive results even if the person in question has not been drinking alcohol as such. Researchers at the University of Florida have been looking at another way of determining alcohol body content by examining the breakdown products in urine. The two breakdown products in particular are ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and ethyl sulfate (EtS). They have shown that non-drinkers who clean their hands regularly using hand sanitisers showed levels of ethyl glucuronide in their urine consistent with alcohol drinkers. However the level of ethyl sulfate was considerably lower. They hope this difference in the levels of the two chemicals may lead to a more reliable test to distinguish between those who have imbibed alcohol and those who have absorbed it through their skin and thus prevent false positive tests and the potentially very damaging wrongful charge of alcohol abuse.

A video   detailing this has been produced by the University of Florida.



Comments


To post comments you need to log in. If it is your first time you will need to subscribe.