| Syllabus sections » |
A3.2.9. Classification of all organisms into three domains using evidence from rRNA base sequences
Description
[N/A]Directly related questions
-
22N.2.HL.TZ0.8c:
Explain how a newly discovered plant species would be classified and named.
-
22N.2.HL.TZ0.8c:
Explain how a newly discovered plant species would be classified and named.
-
22N.2.HL.TZ0.c:
Explain how a newly discovered plant species would be classified and named.
-
22N.2.SL.TZ0.6c:
Explain how a newly discovered plant species would be classified and named.
-
22N.2.SL.TZ0.6c:
Explain how a newly discovered plant species would be classified and named.
-
22N.2.SL.TZ0.c:
Explain how a newly discovered plant species would be classified and named.
- 19N.2.SL.TZ0.1a: State the domain into which ticks are classified.
- 19N.2.SL.TZ0.1a: State the domain into which ticks are classified.
- 19N.2.SL.TZ0.a: State the domain into which ticks are classified.
- 19N.2.SL.TZ0.1a: State the domain into which ticks are classified.
- 19N.2.SL.TZ0.1a: State the domain into which ticks are classified.
- 19N.2.SL.TZ0.a: State the domain into which ticks are classified.
-
20N.1A.HL.TZ0.23:
The cladogram shows some of the groups in the three domains.
[Source: Adapted from Eric Gaba (Sting, fr:Sting), Cherkash, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Phylogenetic_tree.svg.]What domains do X, Y and Z represent?
-
20N.1A.HL.TZ0.23:
The cladogram shows some of the groups in the three domains.
[Source: Adapted from Eric Gaba (Sting, fr:Sting), Cherkash, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Phylogenetic_tree.svg.]What domains do X, Y and Z represent?
-
23M.1A.HL.TZ1.17:
The table compares ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequences of two organisms from each of the three domains by showing an association coefficient. The more similar the rRNA sequences of the organisms, the larger the coefficient.
S. cerevisiae L. minor E. Coli B. firmus M. ruminantium M. barkeri S. cerevisiae — 0.29 0.05 0.08 0.11 0.08 L. minor — 0.10 0.06 0.10 0.07 E. Coli — 0.25 0.12 0.12 B. firmus — 0.13 0.12 M. ruminantium — 0.24 M. barkeri — [Source: Woese, C.R. and Fox, G.E., 1977. Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain:
The primary kingdoms. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA, 74(11), pp. 5088–5090.]What can be concluded from the data?
A. L. minor and E. coli are both eubacteria.
B. S. cerevisiae and M. barkeri are in the same domain.
C. M. ruminantium is an archaean, therefore so is B. firmus.
D. E. coli and B. firmus are in the same domain.
-
23M.1A.HL.TZ1.17:
The table compares ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequences of two organisms from each of the three domains by showing an association coefficient. The more similar the rRNA sequences of the organisms, the larger the coefficient.
S. cerevisiae L. minor E. Coli B. firmus M. ruminantium M. barkeri S. cerevisiae — 0.29 0.05 0.08 0.11 0.08 L. minor — 0.10 0.06 0.10 0.07 E. Coli — 0.25 0.12 0.12 B. firmus — 0.13 0.12 M. ruminantium — 0.24 M. barkeri — [Source: Woese, C.R. and Fox, G.E., 1977. Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain:
The primary kingdoms. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA, 74(11), pp. 5088–5090.]What can be concluded from the data?
A. L. minor and E. coli are both eubacteria.
B. S. cerevisiae and M. barkeri are in the same domain.
C. M. ruminantium is an archaean, therefore so is B. firmus.
D. E. coli and B. firmus are in the same domain.
-
23M.1A.HL.TZ1.17:
The table compares ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequences of two organisms from each of the three domains by showing an association coefficient. The more similar the rRNA sequences of the organisms, the larger the coefficient.
S. cerevisiae L. minor E. Coli B. firmus M. ruminantium M. barkeri S. cerevisiae — 0.29 0.05 0.08 0.11 0.08 L. minor — 0.10 0.06 0.10 0.07 E. Coli — 0.25 0.12 0.12 B. firmus — 0.13 0.12 M. ruminantium — 0.24 M. barkeri — [Source: Woese, C.R. and Fox, G.E., 1977. Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain:
The primary kingdoms. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA, 74(11), pp. 5088–5090.]What can be concluded from the data?
A. L. minor and E. coli are both eubacteria.
B. S. cerevisiae and M. barkeri are in the same domain.
C. M. ruminantium is an archaean, therefore so is B. firmus.
D. E. coli and B. firmus are in the same domain.
-
23M.1A.HL.TZ1.17:
The table compares ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequences of two organisms from each of the three domains by showing an association coefficient. The more similar the rRNA sequences of the organisms, the larger the coefficient.
S. cerevisiae L. minor E. Coli B. firmus M. ruminantium M. barkeri S. cerevisiae — 0.29 0.05 0.08 0.11 0.08 L. minor — 0.10 0.06 0.10 0.07 E. Coli — 0.25 0.12 0.12 B. firmus — 0.13 0.12 M. ruminantium — 0.24 M. barkeri — [Source: Woese, C.R. and Fox, G.E., 1977. Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain:
The primary kingdoms. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA, 74(11), pp. 5088–5090.]What can be concluded from the data?
A. L. minor and E. coli are both eubacteria.
B. S. cerevisiae and M. barkeri are in the same domain.
C. M. ruminantium is an archaean, therefore so is B. firmus.
D. E. coli and B. firmus are in the same domain.
-
23M.1A.HL.TZ1.17:
The table compares ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequences of two organisms from each of the three domains by showing an association coefficient. The more similar the rRNA sequences of the organisms, the larger the coefficient.
S. cerevisiae L. minor E. Coli B. firmus M. ruminantium M. barkeri S. cerevisiae — 0.29 0.05 0.08 0.11 0.08 L. minor — 0.10 0.06 0.10 0.07 E. Coli — 0.25 0.12 0.12 B. firmus — 0.13 0.12 M. ruminantium — 0.24 M. barkeri — [Source: Woese, C.R. and Fox, G.E., 1977. Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain:
The primary kingdoms. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA, 74(11), pp. 5088–5090.]What can be concluded from the data?
A. L. minor and E. coli are both eubacteria.
B. S. cerevisiae and M. barkeri are in the same domain.
C. M. ruminantium is an archaean, therefore so is B. firmus.
D. E. coli and B. firmus are in the same domain.
-
23M.1A.HL.TZ1.17:
The table compares ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequences of two organisms from each of the three domains by showing an association coefficient. The more similar the rRNA sequences of the organisms, the larger the coefficient.
S. cerevisiae L. minor E. Coli B. firmus M. ruminantium M. barkeri S. cerevisiae — 0.29 0.05 0.08 0.11 0.08 L. minor — 0.10 0.06 0.10 0.07 E. Coli — 0.25 0.12 0.12 B. firmus — 0.13 0.12 M. ruminantium — 0.24 M. barkeri — [Source: Woese, C.R. and Fox, G.E., 1977. Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain:
The primary kingdoms. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA, 74(11), pp. 5088–5090.]What can be concluded from the data?
A. L. minor and E. coli are both eubacteria.
B. S. cerevisiae and M. barkeri are in the same domain.
C. M. ruminantium is an archaean, therefore so is B. firmus.
D. E. coli and B. firmus are in the same domain.
-
23M.1A.HL.TZ1.17:
The table compares ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequences of two organisms from each of the three domains by showing an association coefficient. The more similar the rRNA sequences of the organisms, the larger the coefficient.
S. cerevisiae L. minor E. Coli B. firmus M. ruminantium M. barkeri S. cerevisiae — 0.29 0.05 0.08 0.11 0.08 L. minor — 0.10 0.06 0.10 0.07 E. Coli — 0.25 0.12 0.12 B. firmus — 0.13 0.12 M. ruminantium — 0.24 M. barkeri — [Source: Woese, C.R. and Fox, G.E., 1977. Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain:
The primary kingdoms. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA, 74(11), pp. 5088–5090.]What can be concluded from the data?
A. L. minor and E. coli are both eubacteria.
B. S. cerevisiae and M. barkeri are in the same domain.
C. M. ruminantium is an archaean, therefore so is B. firmus.
D. E. coli and B. firmus are in the same domain.
-
23M.1A.HL.TZ1.17:
The table compares ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequences of two organisms from each of the three domains by showing an association coefficient. The more similar the rRNA sequences of the organisms, the larger the coefficient.
S. cerevisiae L. minor E. Coli B. firmus M. ruminantium M. barkeri S. cerevisiae — 0.29 0.05 0.08 0.11 0.08 L. minor — 0.10 0.06 0.10 0.07 E. Coli — 0.25 0.12 0.12 B. firmus — 0.13 0.12 M. ruminantium — 0.24 M. barkeri — [Source: Woese, C.R. and Fox, G.E., 1977. Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain:
The primary kingdoms. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA, 74(11), pp. 5088–5090.]What can be concluded from the data?
A. L. minor and E. coli are both eubacteria.
B. S. cerevisiae and M. barkeri are in the same domain.
C. M. ruminantium is an archaean, therefore so is B. firmus.
D. E. coli and B. firmus are in the same domain.