Directly related questions
-
22N.1A.SL.TZ0.22:
The foxglove, Digitalis purpurea, was once classified in the figwort family. The figwort family has been reclassified and is now much smaller.
[Source: Shiva A., 2008 [image online] Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Purple_Foxglove_(Digitalis_
purpurea)_2008_02.jpg [Accessed 14 January 2023] CC BY SA 4.0.Funhoff, D., 2017. Figwort (Scrophularia canina) flowers, Theisbergstegen, Pfalz, Germany. [image online]
Available at: https://www.naturepl.com/stock-photo/figwort-(scrophularia-canina)-flowers-theisbergstegen-pfalzgermany-june/search/detail-0_01550655.html [Accessed 28 October 2021].]Why were species such as the foxglove moved into other families?
A. The appearance was too dissimilar.
B. The plants are found in different locations.
C. The genera were different.
D. The DNA sequences indicated different ancestry.
-
22N.1A.SL.TZ0.22:
The foxglove, Digitalis purpurea, was once classified in the figwort family. The figwort family has been reclassified and is now much smaller.
[Source: Shiva A., 2008 [image online] Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Purple_Foxglove_(Digitalis_
purpurea)_2008_02.jpg [Accessed 14 January 2023] CC BY SA 4.0.Funhoff, D., 2017. Figwort (Scrophularia canina) flowers, Theisbergstegen, Pfalz, Germany. [image online]
Available at: https://www.naturepl.com/stock-photo/figwort-(scrophularia-canina)-flowers-theisbergstegen-pfalzgermany-june/search/detail-0_01550655.html [Accessed 28 October 2021].]Why were species such as the foxglove moved into other families?
A. The appearance was too dissimilar.
B. The plants are found in different locations.
C. The genera were different.
D. The DNA sequences indicated different ancestry.
-
22N.2.HL.TZ0.8c:
Explain how a newly discovered plant species would be classified and named.
-
22N.2.HL.TZ0.8c:
Explain how a newly discovered plant species would be classified and named.
-
22N.2.HL.TZ0.c:
Explain how a newly discovered plant species would be classified and named.
-
22N.2.SL.TZ0.6c:
Explain how a newly discovered plant species would be classified and named.
-
22N.2.SL.TZ0.6c:
Explain how a newly discovered plant species would be classified and named.
-
22N.2.SL.TZ0.c:
Explain how a newly discovered plant species would be classified and named.
- SPM.1A.HL.TZ0.25: Scientists studied differences in the base sequences of a gene found in five animal species in...
- SPM.1A.HL.TZ0.25: Scientists studied differences in the base sequences of a gene found in five animal species in...
- SPM.1A.HL.TZ0.25: Scientists studied differences in the base sequences of a gene found in five animal species in...
- SPM.1A.HL.TZ0.25: Scientists studied differences in the base sequences of a gene found in five animal species in...
-
19M.1A.HL.TZ1.22:
The image shows an organism belonging to the Kingdom Animalia.
[Source: Titan beetle male. Locality: “RK4,5 route Cacao”, French Guiana
© 2011, Didier Descouens https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/]What feature does this organism have in common with all members of the phylum chordata?
A. Legs and wings
B. Mouth but no anus
C. Bilateral symmetry
D. Chitinous exoskeleton
-
19M.1A.HL.TZ1.22:
The image shows an organism belonging to the Kingdom Animalia.
[Source: Titan beetle male. Locality: “RK4,5 route Cacao”, French Guiana
© 2011, Didier Descouens https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/]What feature does this organism have in common with all members of the phylum chordata?
A. Legs and wings
B. Mouth but no anus
C. Bilateral symmetry
D. Chitinous exoskeleton
-
19M.1A.HL.TZ1.22:
The image shows an organism belonging to the Kingdom Animalia.
[Source: Titan beetle male. Locality: “RK4,5 route Cacao”, French Guiana
© 2011, Didier Descouens https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/]What feature does this organism have in common with all members of the phylum chordata?
A. Legs and wings
B. Mouth but no anus
C. Bilateral symmetry
D. Chitinous exoskeleton
-
19M.1A.HL.TZ1.22:
The image shows an organism belonging to the Kingdom Animalia.
[Source: Titan beetle male. Locality: “RK4,5 route Cacao”, French Guiana
© 2011, Didier Descouens https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/]What feature does this organism have in common with all members of the phylum chordata?
A. Legs and wings
B. Mouth but no anus
C. Bilateral symmetry
D. Chitinous exoskeleton
Sub sections and their related questions
A3.2.1. Need for classification of organisms
- 19N.2.HL.TZ0.5b: Outline the principles used by scientists to classify organisms.
- 19M.1A.HL.TZ2.28: Which is the hierarchy of taxa in order of increasing numbers of species? A. genus, family,...
- 19M.1A.HL.TZ2.23: Which is the hierarchy of taxa in order of decreasing numbers of species? A. domain, phylum,...
-
22N.2.SL.TZ0.6c:
Explain how a newly discovered plant species would be classified and named.
-
22N.2.HL.TZ0.8c:
Explain how a newly discovered plant species would be classified and named.
- 19N.2.HL.TZ0.5b: Outline the principles used by scientists to classify organisms.
- 19N.2.HL.TZ0.b: Outline the principles used by scientists to classify organisms.
- 19M.1A.HL.TZ2.28: Which is the hierarchy of taxa in order of increasing numbers of species? A. genus, family,...
- 19M.1A.HL.TZ2.23: Which is the hierarchy of taxa in order of decreasing numbers of species? A. domain, phylum,...
-
22N.2.SL.TZ0.6c:
Explain how a newly discovered plant species would be classified and named.
-
22N.2.SL.TZ0.c:
Explain how a newly discovered plant species would be classified and named.
-
22N.2.HL.TZ0.8c:
Explain how a newly discovered plant species would be classified and named.
-
22N.2.HL.TZ0.c:
Explain how a newly discovered plant species would be classified and named.
A3.2.2. Difficulties classifying organisms into the traditional hierarchy of taxa
- 19N.2.HL.TZ0.5b: Outline the principles used by scientists to classify organisms.
-
21M.2.HL.TZ1.5b:
Explain how cladistics can be used to investigate evolutionary relationships.
-
23M.2.HL.TZ1.7a:
Describe how plants are named and classified, including recognition features of plant phyla.
-
23M.1A.HL.TZ2.25:
The diagram shows a cladogram for part of the animal kingdom.
[Source: Semmens, D.C., Mirabeau, O., Moghul, I., Pancholi, M.R., Wurm, Y. and Elphick, M.R., 2016. Transcriptomic identification of starfish neuropeptide precursors yields new insights into neuropeptide evolution. Open Biology, [e-journal] 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.150224. Source adapted. Public domain.]
Which group does not represent a clade?
A. 1 to 3B. 1 to 5
C. 4 to 7
D. 1 to 10
- 19N.2.HL.TZ0.5b: Outline the principles used by scientists to classify organisms.
- 19N.2.HL.TZ0.b: Outline the principles used by scientists to classify organisms.
-
21M.2.HL.TZ1.5b:
Explain how cladistics can be used to investigate evolutionary relationships.
-
21M.2.HL.TZ1.b:
Explain how cladistics can be used to investigate evolutionary relationships.
-
23M.2.HL.TZ1.7a:
Describe how plants are named and classified, including recognition features of plant phyla.
-
23M.2.HL.TZ1.a:
Describe how plants are named and classified, including recognition features of plant phyla.
-
23M.1A.HL.TZ2.25:
The diagram shows a cladogram for part of the animal kingdom.
[Source: Semmens, D.C., Mirabeau, O., Moghul, I., Pancholi, M.R., Wurm, Y. and Elphick, M.R., 2016. Transcriptomic identification of starfish neuropeptide precursors yields new insights into neuropeptide evolution. Open Biology, [e-journal] 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.150224. Source adapted. Public domain.]
Which group does not represent a clade?
A. 1 to 3B. 1 to 5
C. 4 to 7
D. 1 to 10
A3.2.3. Advantages of classification corresponding to evolutionary relationships
NoneA3.2.4. Clades as groups of organisms with common ancestry and shared characteristics
- 22M.1A.SL.TZ2.21: Which encircled area shows a clade?
- 19M.2.HL.TZ2.4c: Outline the types of evidence that can be used to place a species in a particular clade.
- 22M.1A.SL.TZ2.21: Which encircled area shows a clade?
- 19M.2.HL.TZ2.4c: Outline the types of evidence that can be used to place a species in a particular clade.
- 19M.2.HL.TZ2.c: Outline the types of evidence that can be used to place a species in a particular clade.
A3.2.5. Gradual accumulation of sequence differences as the basis for estimates of when clades diverged from a common ancestor
NoneA3.2.6. Base sequences of genes or amino acid sequences of proteins as the basis for constructing cladograms
NoneA3.2.7. Analysing cladograms
- 19N.2.HL.TZ0.3a: Describe what is shown in a cladogram.
-
22M.1A.HL.TZ1.23:
Data regarding the presence (+) or absence (–) of five traits in several different species are shown in the table.
Which cladogram best represents the relationship between the five species?
- 22M.1A.SL.TZ2.21: Which encircled area shows a clade?
- 21N.1A.HL.TZ0.23: The cladogram shows one theory of how species of hominin evolved. What can be deduced using...
-
19N.2.HL.TZ0.1d:
State the proportion of the ancestral allele for the gene GS3 in the O. rufipogon-III population.
- 19N.2.HL.TZ0.1e: Distinguish between the proportion of ancestral and derived alleles for all three genes in O....
- 19N.2.HL.TZ0.1f: State one reason for having a control group.
- 19N.2.SL.TZ0.1g: Using all of the data, discuss whether there is evidence that the two sub-species of O. sativa...
-
19M.2.SL.TZ2.4d:
The cladogram includes four marsupial (non-placental mammal) families.
[Source: Koala image: Quartl, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Phascolarctos_cinereus#/media/
File:Friendly_Female_Koala.JPG; Wombat image: JJ Harrison, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wombat#/
media/File:Vombatus_ursinus_-Maria_Island_National_Park.jpg; Marsupial lion: Nobu Tamura,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsupial_lion#/media/File:Thylacoleo_BW.jpg;
Diprotodontoidea image: Anne Musser]Deduce the family that is most closely related to the Diprotodontoidea.
- 21M.1A.HL.TZ2.23: What information can be deduced from the sequence of nodes in a cladogram? A. The geological...
- 21M.2.HL.TZ1.5c: Cladistics and other evolutionary evidence suggest that mammals and birds have a more recent...
-
19M.1A.HL.TZ2.26:
The cladogram shows some major orders of placental mammals and is based on biochemical evidence.
[Source: © International Baccalaureate Organization 2019]
Which conclusion can be drawn from evidence in the cladogram?
A. Primates and Sirenia have not evolved from a common ancestor.
B. Primates and Cetacea do not form part of any clade.
C. Cetacea are less closely related to Sirenia than to Primates.
D. Xenarthra have not been changed by evolution for longer than other clades.
-
20N.1A.HL.TZ0.23:
The cladogram shows some of the groups in the three domains.
[Source: Adapted from Eric Gaba (Sting, fr:Sting), Cherkash, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Phylogenetic_tree.svg.]What domains do X, Y and Z represent?
- SPM.1A.HL.TZ0.25: Scientists studied differences in the base sequences of a gene found in five animal species in...
- SPM.1A.HL.TZ0.25: Scientists studied differences in the base sequences of a gene found in five animal species in...
- SPM.1A.HL.TZ0.25: Scientists studied differences in the base sequences of a gene found in five animal species in...
- 19N.2.HL.TZ0.3a: Describe what is shown in a cladogram.
- 19N.2.HL.TZ0.a: Describe what is shown in a cladogram.
-
22M.1A.HL.TZ1.23:
Data regarding the presence (+) or absence (–) of five traits in several different species are shown in the table.
Which cladogram best represents the relationship between the five species?
- 22M.1A.SL.TZ2.21: Which encircled area shows a clade?
- 21N.1A.HL.TZ0.23: The cladogram shows one theory of how species of hominin evolved. What can be deduced using...
-
19N.2.HL.TZ0.1d:
State the proportion of the ancestral allele for the gene GS3 in the O. rufipogon-III population.
- 19N.2.HL.TZ0.1e: Distinguish between the proportion of ancestral and derived alleles for all three genes in O....
- 19N.2.HL.TZ0.1f: State one reason for having a control group.
- 19N.2.SL.TZ0.1g: Using all of the data, discuss whether there is evidence that the two sub-species of O. sativa...
-
19N.2.HL.TZ0.d:
State the proportion of the ancestral allele for the gene GS3 in the O. rufipogon-III population.
- 19N.2.HL.TZ0.e: Distinguish between the proportion of ancestral and derived alleles for all three genes in O....
- 19N.2.HL.TZ0.f: State one reason for having a control group.
- 19N.2.SL.TZ0.g: Using all of the data, discuss whether there is evidence that the two sub-species of O. sativa...
-
19M.2.SL.TZ2.4d:
The cladogram includes four marsupial (non-placental mammal) families.
[Source: Koala image: Quartl, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Phascolarctos_cinereus#/media/
File:Friendly_Female_Koala.JPG; Wombat image: JJ Harrison, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wombat#/
media/File:Vombatus_ursinus_-Maria_Island_National_Park.jpg; Marsupial lion: Nobu Tamura,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsupial_lion#/media/File:Thylacoleo_BW.jpg;
Diprotodontoidea image: Anne Musser]Deduce the family that is most closely related to the Diprotodontoidea.
-
19M.2.SL.TZ2.d:
The cladogram includes four marsupial (non-placental mammal) families.
[Source: Koala image: Quartl, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Phascolarctos_cinereus#/media/
File:Friendly_Female_Koala.JPG; Wombat image: JJ Harrison, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wombat#/
media/File:Vombatus_ursinus_-Maria_Island_National_Park.jpg; Marsupial lion: Nobu Tamura,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsupial_lion#/media/File:Thylacoleo_BW.jpg;
Diprotodontoidea image: Anne Musser]Deduce the family that is most closely related to the Diprotodontoidea.
- 21M.1A.HL.TZ2.23: What information can be deduced from the sequence of nodes in a cladogram? A. The geological...
- 21M.2.HL.TZ1.5c: Cladistics and other evolutionary evidence suggest that mammals and birds have a more recent...
- 21M.2.HL.TZ1.c: Cladistics and other evolutionary evidence suggest that mammals and birds have a more recent...
-
19M.1A.HL.TZ2.26:
The cladogram shows some major orders of placental mammals and is based on biochemical evidence.
[Source: © International Baccalaureate Organization 2019]
Which conclusion can be drawn from evidence in the cladogram?
A. Primates and Sirenia have not evolved from a common ancestor.
B. Primates and Cetacea do not form part of any clade.
C. Cetacea are less closely related to Sirenia than to Primates.
D. Xenarthra have not been changed by evolution for longer than other clades.
-
20N.1A.HL.TZ0.23:
The cladogram shows some of the groups in the three domains.
[Source: Adapted from Eric Gaba (Sting, fr:Sting), Cherkash, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Phylogenetic_tree.svg.]What domains do X, Y and Z represent?
- SPM.1A.HL.TZ0.25: Scientists studied differences in the base sequences of a gene found in five animal species in...
A3.2.8. Using cladistics to investigate whether the classification of groups corresponds to evolutionary relationships
- 19M.2.HL.TZ2.4b: Some plant families, such as the figwort family, have been reclassified on the basis of evidence...
-
21M.2.HL.TZ1.5b:
Explain how cladistics can be used to investigate evolutionary relationships.
-
22N.1A.SL.TZ0.22:
The foxglove, Digitalis purpurea, was once classified in the figwort family. The figwort family has been reclassified and is now much smaller.
[Source: Shiva A., 2008 [image online] Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Purple_Foxglove_(Digitalis_
purpurea)_2008_02.jpg [Accessed 14 January 2023] CC BY SA 4.0.Funhoff, D., 2017. Figwort (Scrophularia canina) flowers, Theisbergstegen, Pfalz, Germany. [image online]
Available at: https://www.naturepl.com/stock-photo/figwort-(scrophularia-canina)-flowers-theisbergstegen-pfalzgermany-june/search/detail-0_01550655.html [Accessed 28 October 2021].]Why were species such as the foxglove moved into other families?
A. The appearance was too dissimilar.
B. The plants are found in different locations.
C. The genera were different.
D. The DNA sequences indicated different ancestry.
- 19M.2.HL.TZ2.4b: Some plant families, such as the figwort family, have been reclassified on the basis of evidence...
- 19M.2.HL.TZ2.b: Some plant families, such as the figwort family, have been reclassified on the basis of evidence...
-
21M.2.HL.TZ1.5b:
Explain how cladistics can be used to investigate evolutionary relationships.
-
21M.2.HL.TZ1.b:
Explain how cladistics can be used to investigate evolutionary relationships.
-
22N.1A.SL.TZ0.22:
The foxglove, Digitalis purpurea, was once classified in the figwort family. The figwort family has been reclassified and is now much smaller.
[Source: Shiva A., 2008 [image online] Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Purple_Foxglove_(Digitalis_
purpurea)_2008_02.jpg [Accessed 14 January 2023] CC BY SA 4.0.Funhoff, D., 2017. Figwort (Scrophularia canina) flowers, Theisbergstegen, Pfalz, Germany. [image online]
Available at: https://www.naturepl.com/stock-photo/figwort-(scrophularia-canina)-flowers-theisbergstegen-pfalzgermany-june/search/detail-0_01550655.html [Accessed 28 October 2021].]Why were species such as the foxglove moved into other families?
A. The appearance was too dissimilar.
B. The plants are found in different locations.
C. The genera were different.
D. The DNA sequences indicated different ancestry.
A3.2.9. Classification of all organisms into three domains using evidence from rRNA base sequences
- 19N.2.SL.TZ0.1a: State the domain into which ticks are classified.
-
22N.2.SL.TZ0.6c:
Explain how a newly discovered plant species would be classified and named.
-
22N.2.HL.TZ0.8c:
Explain how a newly discovered plant species would be classified and named.
-
20N.1A.HL.TZ0.23:
The cladogram shows some of the groups in the three domains.
[Source: Adapted from Eric Gaba (Sting, fr:Sting), Cherkash, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Phylogenetic_tree.svg.]What domains do X, Y and Z represent?
-
23M.1A.HL.TZ1.17:
The table compares ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequences of two organisms from each of the three domains by showing an association coefficient. The more similar the rRNA sequences of the organisms, the larger the coefficient.
S. cerevisiae L. minor E. Coli B. firmus M. ruminantium M. barkeri S. cerevisiae — 0.29 0.05 0.08 0.11 0.08 L. minor — 0.10 0.06 0.10 0.07 E. Coli — 0.25 0.12 0.12 B. firmus — 0.13 0.12 M. ruminantium — 0.24 M. barkeri — [Source: Woese, C.R. and Fox, G.E., 1977. Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain:
The primary kingdoms. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA, 74(11), pp. 5088–5090.]What can be concluded from the data?
A. L. minor and E. coli are both eubacteria.
B. S. cerevisiae and M. barkeri are in the same domain.
C. M. ruminantium is an archaean, therefore so is B. firmus.
D. E. coli and B. firmus are in the same domain.
-
23M.1A.HL.TZ1.17:
The table compares ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequences of two organisms from each of the three domains by showing an association coefficient. The more similar the rRNA sequences of the organisms, the larger the coefficient.
S. cerevisiae L. minor E. Coli B. firmus M. ruminantium M. barkeri S. cerevisiae — 0.29 0.05 0.08 0.11 0.08 L. minor — 0.10 0.06 0.10 0.07 E. Coli — 0.25 0.12 0.12 B. firmus — 0.13 0.12 M. ruminantium — 0.24 M. barkeri — [Source: Woese, C.R. and Fox, G.E., 1977. Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain:
The primary kingdoms. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA, 74(11), pp. 5088–5090.]What can be concluded from the data?
A. L. minor and E. coli are both eubacteria.
B. S. cerevisiae and M. barkeri are in the same domain.
C. M. ruminantium is an archaean, therefore so is B. firmus.
D. E. coli and B. firmus are in the same domain.
-
23M.1A.HL.TZ1.17:
The table compares ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequences of two organisms from each of the three domains by showing an association coefficient. The more similar the rRNA sequences of the organisms, the larger the coefficient.
S. cerevisiae L. minor E. Coli B. firmus M. ruminantium M. barkeri S. cerevisiae — 0.29 0.05 0.08 0.11 0.08 L. minor — 0.10 0.06 0.10 0.07 E. Coli — 0.25 0.12 0.12 B. firmus — 0.13 0.12 M. ruminantium — 0.24 M. barkeri — [Source: Woese, C.R. and Fox, G.E., 1977. Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain:
The primary kingdoms. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA, 74(11), pp. 5088–5090.]What can be concluded from the data?
A. L. minor and E. coli are both eubacteria.
B. S. cerevisiae and M. barkeri are in the same domain.
C. M. ruminantium is an archaean, therefore so is B. firmus.
D. E. coli and B. firmus are in the same domain.
- 19N.2.SL.TZ0.1a: State the domain into which ticks are classified.
- 19N.2.SL.TZ0.a: State the domain into which ticks are classified.
-
22N.2.SL.TZ0.6c:
Explain how a newly discovered plant species would be classified and named.
-
22N.2.SL.TZ0.c:
Explain how a newly discovered plant species would be classified and named.
-
22N.2.HL.TZ0.8c:
Explain how a newly discovered plant species would be classified and named.
-
22N.2.HL.TZ0.c:
Explain how a newly discovered plant species would be classified and named.
-
20N.1A.HL.TZ0.23:
The cladogram shows some of the groups in the three domains.
[Source: Adapted from Eric Gaba (Sting, fr:Sting), Cherkash, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Phylogenetic_tree.svg.]What domains do X, Y and Z represent?
-
23M.1A.HL.TZ1.17:
The table compares ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequences of two organisms from each of the three domains by showing an association coefficient. The more similar the rRNA sequences of the organisms, the larger the coefficient.
S. cerevisiae L. minor E. Coli B. firmus M. ruminantium M. barkeri S. cerevisiae — 0.29 0.05 0.08 0.11 0.08 L. minor — 0.10 0.06 0.10 0.07 E. Coli — 0.25 0.12 0.12 B. firmus — 0.13 0.12 M. ruminantium — 0.24 M. barkeri — [Source: Woese, C.R. and Fox, G.E., 1977. Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain:
The primary kingdoms. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA, 74(11), pp. 5088–5090.]What can be concluded from the data?
A. L. minor and E. coli are both eubacteria.
B. S. cerevisiae and M. barkeri are in the same domain.
C. M. ruminantium is an archaean, therefore so is B. firmus.
D. E. coli and B. firmus are in the same domain.