Question 22M.2.HL.TZ2.5
Date | May 2022 | Marks available | [Maximum mark: 5] | Reference code | 22M.2.HL.TZ2.5 |
Level | HL | Paper | 2 | Time zone | TZ2 |
Command term | Calculate, Describe, Explain, State | Question number | 5 | Adapted from | N/A |
Iron(II) disulfide, FeS2, has been mistaken for gold.
State the full electronic configuration of Fe2+.
[1]
1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 3d6 ✔
Mostly well done which was a pleasant surprise since this is not overly easy, predictably some gave [Ar] 4s2 3d4.

Explain why there is a large increase from the 8th to the 9th ionization energy of iron.
[2]
Any two of:
IE9: electron in lower energy level
OR
IE9: more stable/full electron level ✔
IE9: electron closer to nucleus
OR
IE9: electron more tightly held by nucleus ✔
IE9: less shielding by «complete» inner levels ✔
Despite some confusion regarding which sub-level the electrons were being removed from, many candidates were able to make at least one valid point, commonly in terms of lower energy/ full sub level/closer to nucleus.

Calculate the oxidation state of sulfur in iron(II) disulfide, FeS2.
[1]
–1 ✔
Accept “– I”.
This was an easy question, yet 30% of the candidates were unable to work it out; some wrote the oxidation state in the conventionally incorrect format, 1- and lost the mark.

Describe the bonding in iron, Fe (s).
[1]
electrostatic attraction/hold between «lattice of» positive ions/cations AND delocalized «valence» electrons ✔
Most candidates knew the bonding in Fe is metallic but some did not “describe” it or missed the type of attraction, a minor mistake; others referred to nuclei or protons instead of cations/positive ions. In some cases, candidates referred too ionic bonding, probably still thinking of FeS2 (not reading the question well). Overall, only 30% answered satisfactorily.
